Re: [exim] about Sender: and envelope reverse-path in today'…

Pàgina inicial
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: Tony Finch
Data:  
A: Marc Haber
CC: exim-users
Assumpte: Re: [exim] about Sender: and envelope reverse-path in today's systems
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Marc Haber wrote:
>
> It is likely amongst the user base of the majority of systems in use
> nowadays that the owner neither has a static FQDN nor a static IP
> address. And you don't want to have e-mails going out with
> "debian_user@???" since that FQDN might belong
> to somebody else in two minutes.


Try reading the documentation for qualify_domain. It doesn't have to have
anything to do with the machine's current reverse DNS. You should use your
friendly configuration script to get a working mail domain from the admin.

> Where can I obtain exactly the same data that exim uses to generate
> the Sender:


Perhaps by reading the documentation? Try section 44.14.

> > If you are adding a special header then it isn't appropriate to give
> > it the special semantics of Sender: which allow it to be omitted when
> > it is the same as From:.
>
> It is. If the From: has the right value for the authenticated sender
> (which is almost never the case in today's use),
> X-Authenticated-Sender or whatever it is named can be omitted as well.


How is the recipient supposed to interpret it, when they don't know the
specification for the header? They might think that the absence of the
header means that the message was forged. It's better from the protocol
design point of view to always insert the header. It's also easier to
configure Exim to do this.

Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot@???> http://dotat.at/
MALIN HEBRIDES: NORTHEAST 4 OR 5 INCREASING 6. RAIN LATER. GOOD BECOMING
MODERATE.