Re: [exim] A weaker variant of check_spool_space

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M\the complete thread tree sorted by date
MMPhilip Hazel at <-
MM 
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Nico Erfurth
CC: exim-users, Chris Thompson
Subject: Re: [exim] A weaker variant of check_spool_space
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Nico Erfurth wrote:

> But maybe its better to move more things inside the acls.

That's usually more flexible. 

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book:    http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book



This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: AW: [exim] A weaker variant of check_spool_spaceRe: [exim] ${rfc2047:} questions->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)