Re: AW: [exim] Router name lenth bug?

Steffen Heil wrote:

>>>However, exim didn't detect an error when loading, even worse, IT USED
>>>THE WRONG TRANSPORT silently...
>>
>>That seems unbelievable. Have you got evidence to prove this?
>
> I will try to find prove.
> But I am already sure, I got both mails.

Well, that only proves that you received two mails, not that exim did
anything wrong.

Unless you have a complex configuration, a simple test with

exim -d -bt the.incorrect.routed@???

should reveal enough information. Also, the relevant parts of your
configuration and the debuglog would help us to understand, and maybe
solve, your problem.

Nico