Autor: David Woodhouse Data: A: Jon Kyme CC: exim-users Assumpte: Re: [exim] Thanks for all your input
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 15:21 +0100, Jon Kyme wrote: > peter@??? wrote:
> > It gets addressed to the orginal return-path on the server where
> > the NDR is generated,
> > but the alias expansion happens on delivery to another server.
>
> Yes, I see that. I suppose I'm asking if the forwarder (alias-expander) is
> correct to preserve <>, or whether it should supply a new, valid, non-null
> reverse-path. Anyway, I guess this is a bit off-topic. Sorry,
$DEITY yes it's correct to leave it as <>. Turning bounces into
non-bounces would be _BAD_.
