Re: [Exim] Re: What is better OS for Exim

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Richard Welty
Date:  
To: Exim users list
Subject: Re: [Exim] Re: What is better OS for Exim
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:08:57 +0100 (BST) "Alan J. Flavell" <a.flavell@???> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, Nathan Ollerenshaw wrote:
> > Also, FC makes it easy to keep things updated.


> Only as long as the release is current (+/- half a year or so). If
> you're to stay with the programme (as opposed to doing your own
> support single-handed for a discontinued release) then you'd need a
> re-install 2 or 3 times a year.


> But this is the wrong place for OS advocacy, so I'll try to shut up
> now.


i concur, _but_,

i am running fc1 and fc2 systems side by side, and both releases
are currently being maintained by the fedora project. critical
updates are beingannounced for both, simultaneously.

fedoralegacy.org is even supplying updates for rh 8 and 9, and
when the main fedora project drops fc1, i would anticipate that
fedoralegacy will pick it up.

so i don't think your representation is 100% accurate.

richard
--
Richard Welty                                         rwelty@???
Averill Park Networking                                         518-573-7592
    Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security