Fengchou,
I am sending this through Exim-Users because you seem to reject my
mail. The response from your MX in response to the "MAIL FROM:"
command from my ISP (comcast.net) was:
550 Administrative prohibition.
If you ask a question in personal mail, you'd better make sure that you
are able to receive the answer.
-tor
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@???>
> Subject: Returned mail: delivery problems encountered
> Date: 2 Jul 2004 15:42:39 +0000
> To: <tor=sl6xx=luxent.com.tw=tqazvejj@???>
> Content-Type: message/delivery-status
>
> Reporting-MTA: dns; comcast.net
> Arrival-Date: 2 Jul 2004 15:42:30 +0000
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822; <sl6xx@???>
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.1.0 MAIL FROM: <tor=sl6xx=luxent.com.tw=tqazvejj@???>
> 550 REPLY: 550_Administrative_prohibition
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; Permanent Failure: Other address status
> Last-Attempt-Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:42:38 -0000
>
> --_40e5826f.3f74.0+comcast.net=_
> Content-Type: message/rfc822
>
> Received: from dot.slett.net ([24.4.199.45])
> by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP
> id <200407021542300150079avde>; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:42:30
> +0000
> Received: from think.home ([192.168.0.191])
> by dot.slett.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
> id 1BgQBJ-0007V8-Hy
> for sl6xx@???; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 08:42:29 -0700
> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618)
> In-Reply-To: <3182.192.168.1.50.1088771755.squirrel@192.168.1.50>
> References: <DFD38E90-CBF9-11D8-8059-00039381C3A4@???>
> <3182.192.168.1.50.1088771755.squirrel@192.168.1.50>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> Message-Id: <6C50B860-CC3E-11D8-9ADC-00039381C3A4@???>
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> From: Tor Slettnes <tor@???>
> Subject: Re: [Exim] help! cannot see message body in MUAs
> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:42:28 -0700
> To: sl6xx@???
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618)
>
>
> On Jul 2, 2004, at 05:35, sl6xx@??? wrote:
>
> > Thank you Tor! Now I saw the problem. Is this the problem of the
> > sender
> > or our own (exim)? To compare the difference, I used another e-mail
> > account
> > on our ISP's machine which (I believe) is running sendmail. But
> I've
> > got
> > different header and the MUA can interprete the mail correctly.
>
> This has nothing to do with the MTA - except that maybe SpamAssassin
> munges the header on your way out. (You may not want to run SA for
> outgoing mail anyway.. )
>
> I would send yourself a mail to see.
