Author: Fred Viles Date: To: exim-users Subject: Re: [Exim] exiscan-acl-4.24-22 - SPF support
On 26 May 2004 at 10:26, David Woodhouse wrote about
"Re: [Exim] exiscan-acl-4.24-22 - SP":
| On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 11:24 +0200, Tom Kistner wrote:
| > David Woodhouse wrote: |... | > OK, but why is following a "fail" verdict silly? If a domain is so
| > strict that it wants non-authorized relays to fail, why can't we honor
| > that request? | | Because they have no right to make that request.
The administrator (and by proxy, owner) of a domain has no right to
determine how it is used? That strikes me as an extreme view.
This message was posted to the following mailing lists: