Re: [Exim] exiscan-acl-4.24-22 - SPF support

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Fred Viles
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] exiscan-acl-4.24-22 - SPF support
On 26 May 2004 at 10:26, David Woodhouse wrote about
    "Re: [Exim] exiscan-acl-4.24-22 - SP":


| On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 11:24 +0200, Tom Kistner wrote:
| > David Woodhouse wrote:

|...
| > OK, but why is following a "fail" verdict silly? If a domain is so
| > strict that it wants non-authorized relays to fail, why can't we honor
| > that request?

|
| Because they have no right to make that request.


The administrator (and by proxy, owner) of a domain has no right to
determine how it is used? That strikes me as an extreme view.

- Fred