Author: Ian A B Eiloart Date: To: exim-users Subject: Re: [Exim] FW: Defending Against Rumplestiltskin Attacks???
--On Thursday, May 13, 2004 10:17 am +0100 Matthew Byng-Maddick
<exim@???> wrote:
>> if it's not the most polite thing you can do[1], it is what makes my
>> users happiest. Our delays have cut spam by over 90% and are saving lots
>> of our
>
> Other delays will do that, I agree. I'm seeing similar orders on our
> front-facing MX at work. That's why I specifically highlit the DATA
> delays.
Wouldn't you have to be prescient to delay *before* detecting the spam?
