Re: [Exim] Recipient callout problem

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Kelley Reynolds
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] Recipient callout problem
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Kelley Reynolds wrote:

> Seems like a pretty easy thing to make an option to make everybody
> happy. If the default was to use a blank sender for recipient
> callouts, then add an option like 'tuple' or something that would use
> the new 4.31 method, you'd get the best of both worlds. One could just
> use different ACL's for whichever bits you wanted to use with
> whichever hosts.


Yes, I think that's probably what I will do.


--
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book:    http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book