On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 14:09, gARetH baBB wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
>
> > enforce 1 message per connection. It is highly likely that this list
> > will move to at least partial VERPing in the future (and a seriously
> > aggressive policy for unsub on bounces).
>
> The trouble with VERP is it kills the callout cache, and I suspect there
> are more than the average number of list subscribers using callouts on
> their MXs on this list than elsewhere.
Depends whether the VERP is purely list/recipient related, or whether it
carries a message varying part too. I was intending to *not* have a
message varying part.
> Expect lots of callouts if you do this.
I get lots already. Adding VERP would mean I get a few more, but the
list volume is such that reasonable caching values would work well.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
