Re: [Exim] me again

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Jeff Lasman
Date:  
To: Exim-Users
Subject: Re: [Exim] me again
On Friday 16 January 2004 02:57 am, Alan J. Flavell wrote:

> It would be a disastrous mistake, at least in our case, to go
> composing autoreplies to the counterfeited envelope sender addresses
> ("collateral spam"). Much preferable to give a 5xx response
> containing some informative text, and leave the offering MTA to do
> the right thing. If it goes and does the wrong thing, then at least
> it'll be doing it on its own responsibility, not on ours.


we've got a domain that used to belong to an ISP. So much spam it's
incredible. We point web requests to it to our own webhosting domain.

The email was so ridiculous to it we finally, in desperation, set the mx
to a pointer to 127.0.0.1.

We set it back recently, and it's still getting tons of junk. Spammers
don't even remove addresses from lists when they hit their own systems.

Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 US
Professional Internet Services & Support / Consulting / Colocation
Our blists address used on lists is for list email only
Phone +1 909 324-9706, or see: "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html"