Re: [Exim] sender verify failed, why?

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Rejo Zenger
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] sender verify failed, why?
++ 21/12/03 06:15 -0600 - Edgar Lovecraft:
> 2003-12-21 11:19:19 1AY0fy-0008EP-No <= sister@???
>H=mxzilla4.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.48] P=esmtp S=9190 id=811fu05-
>t-al6iu42$j83263-e@??? T="Fw: Fw: MED1CA1 BRE--AK THRU -- L00SE
>WE1GHT Wh1LE YOU Slee-->eep h" from <sister@???> for
>rejo@???
><-----------
> This is where the rejo@??? has been re-written to
>rejo@???
> Is that what is supposed to happen as that is the 'unroutable' address
><-----------
> 2003-12-21 11:19:24 1AY0fy-0008EP-No ** rejo@???
><rejo@???>: Unrouteable address


So, just to make things clear: krikkit.local is supposed to be
unroutable according to this message?

>Yes, look at that address re-writing and delivery process. test with "exim
>-bt" and/or "exim -bv" and/or "exim -brw", that will test recipient
>ferifies in two different ways, and the last one is for testing rewrite
>rules.


I have no rewriting rules, so that's very easy. The others are noo
problem I guess:

  damogran:~ # sendmail -bt rejo@???
  rejo@???
      <-- rejo@???
    router = dnslookup, transport = remote_smtp
    host krikkit.local [10.0.0.23]


damogran:~ # sendmail -bv rejo@???
rejo@??? verified

damogran:~ # sendmail -brw rejo@???
No rewrite rules are defined

On the DNS stuff:

damogran:~ # dig +short krikkit.local mx

damogran:~ # dig +short krikkit.local a
10.0.0.23

damogran:~ # dig +short krikkit.local aaaa
2001:888:142f:0:250:fcff:fe35:920f

It all looks healthy to me. Still occasianaly mail is being bounced:

  rejo@???
    (generated from subs=bugtraq@???)
    Unrouteable address


Any more ideas?

--
Rejo Zenger <rejo@???> - http://rejo.zenger.nl - PGP 0x75FC50F3