From: Rejo Zenger <subs=exim-users@???>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 11:23:55 +0100
>That's what I thought before as well, but having checked that I'm quite
>sure that at the time the error they all had the same and correct data.
>It still happens:
<-----------
This is where the message has been 'accepted' to be delivered.
<-----------
2003-12-21 11:19:19 1AY0fy-0008EP-No <= sister@???
H=mxzilla4.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.48] P=esmtp S=9190 id=811fu05-
t-al6iu42$j83263-e@??? T="Fw: Fw: MED1CA1 BRE--AK THRU -- L00SE
WE1GHT Wh1LE YOU Slee-->eep h" from <sister@???> for
rejo@???
<-----------
This is where the rejo@??? has been re-written to
rejo@???
Is that what is supposed to happen as that is the 'unroutable' address
<-----------
2003-12-21 11:19:24 1AY0fy-0008EP-No ** rejo@???
<rejo@???>: Unrouteable address
<-----------
This is where the 'bounce' message has been generated by the system
<-----------
2003-12-21 11:19:24 1AY0gG-0008Ek-Jl <= <> R=1AY0fy-0008EP-No U=mail
P=local S=10023 T="Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender" from
<> for sister@???
<-----------
Does this not show that the 'bounce' message being generated has
'completed' the transaction???
<-----------
2003-12-21 11:19:24 1AY0fy-0008EP-No Completed
<-----------
>Any idea where to look? Next?
Yes, look at that address re-writing and delivery process. test with "exim
-bt" and/or "exim -bv" and/or "exim -brw", that will test recipient
ferifies in two different ways, and the last one is for testing rewrite
rules.
--
--EAL--
