AW: Class(less) Networking (was Re: [Exim] question about AC…

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Matthias Lewandowski
Date:  
To: 'Adam D. Barratt'
Subject: AW: Class(less) Networking (was Re: [Exim] question about ACL)
thanks for that info...

that was the missing clue...

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Matthias Lewandowski
Systemtechnik Internet


Telefon +49 (30) 59 00 69-00
Telefax +49 (30) 59 00 69-99
CBXNET combox internet service gmbh
Potsdamer Strasse 96 - D-10785 Berlin
Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg - HRB 71171
Geschäftsführer: Lutz Treutler

<http://www.cbxnet.de> - <mailto:support@cbxnet.de>




> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Adam D. Barratt [mailto:exim-users@adam-barratt.org.uk]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Dezember 2003 13:56
> An: exim-users@???
> Betreff: Class(less) Networking (was Re: [Exim] question about ACL)
>
>
> Matthias Lewandowski wrote, Friday, December 12, 2003 12:46 PM
>
> > isn't a class C the same as /24?
>
> Yes and no. Both contain 256 addresses, but `Class C' defines
> only a limited
> number of them.
>
> > (maybe there's another definition of a class c
> > i'm not common with...)
>
> <URL:http://www.burningvoid.com/iaq/network-class.html>, for
> instance. The
> traditional `classes' refer not only to the /size/ of the
> network, but to
> the actual network space allocated - a Class C network can
> only range from
> 192.0.0.0 to 223.255.255.0.
>
> That's one of the reasons that CIDR (/24 etc) was created.
>
> Adam
>
>
> --
>
> ## List details at

http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/ ##