Re: [Exim] bounces from pipes killed by segv

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: John Jetmore
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] bounces from pipes killed by segv
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, John Jetmore wrote:

> > ignore_status
>
> I'm not sure how to take this. I have always had ignore_status set to
> false in my transport (included in it's entirety below). It seems from
> reading that if I set it to true the subprocess will always be seen as a
> successful delivery, which is just as bad (arguably worse because noone
> knows about it) as generating a bounce.


Yes. Sorry. I answered too quickly. There doesn't seem to be a way to
say "make crashes temporary", as temp_errors applies only to return
codes.

--
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book:    http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book