Re: [Exim] Message-ID: vs Message-Id: header logging

John W. Baxter said:
>
> Exim logs the Message-ID: header of an incoming message in the "reception"
> line. If there isn't a Message-ID: header, Exim adds one but doesn't log
> it. [Per the Exim 4 book.]
>
> So far, so good.
>
> However, Eudora (5 and the newish 6) produces not a Message-ID: header but
> a
> Message-Id: (little d) header. For example:
>
> Message-Id: <p06002042bb8d133535a6@???>

Should be seen as the same...

message-id:
Message-ID:
meSSAGE-Id:
MESSAGE-ID:

Should all equate to the same...

From RFC 822...
- - - -
When matching any other syntactic unit, case is to be ignored.
For example, the field-names "From", "FROM", "from", and even
"FroM" are semantically equal and should all be treated ident-
ically.

When generating these units, any mix of upper and lower case
alphabetic characters may be used. The case shown in this
specification is suggested for message-creating processes.
- - - -

--
Kevin W. Reed - TNET Services, Inc.
Mailing List Account