Re: [Exim] Verisign pulls a fast one

At 14:04 +0200 2003/09/16, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>On (2003/09/16 12:56), Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
>
>> > > > My concern is for FQDNs that don't have an A record, but do have an MX
>> > > > record. This is perfectly legal DNS, although I can't find an example
>> > > > to test with.
>> > >
>> > > cam.ac.uk
>> >
>> > That's neither a .com nor a .net. :-)
>>
>> stdlib.net , or hea.net. A deliverable address at both is colmmacc@
>
>Great. It looks like VeriSign only return the abominable wildcarded
>response for non-existent TLDs.

of course! are you all going bonkers?? Verysign cannot take authority
of a delegated second (is it second? maybe first. whatever) level
domain!

Giuliano