--
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 09:31, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>
> > Most Debian users are still using Exim version 3.36 (built 12-Mar-2003)
> > even if they are using -- like me -- the "testing" distribution. Is
> > there a case to be put to moving this fairly large installed base to
> > version 4?
>
> That is a question for the Debian folks to answer. (I know they are well
> aware of the issue.)
>
Indeed they are well aware of it. I have recently reviewed the
procedure. The update so far doesn't do the best of 3->4 conf
conversion... but it only makes a few mistakes there, unless you never
touched exim.conf. Then it works.
A feature of the Exim3->Exim4 update in the Debian Distro is that the
update asks if you want to move all of your exim3 que stuff to exim4 ...
if yes, promotes everything.
If you could work out a good exim.conf for v4 before your migrate...
you'd be far ahead. Including DMAN's spamc stuff as well.
--
greg, greg@???
REMEMBER ED CURRY!
http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry
Votre regard est plus penetrant qu'une stalagmite sertie dans son antre
d'albatre
--
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[ signature.asc of type application/pgp-signature deleted ]
--
