Hello Mark!
3 May 2003, Mark Edwards wrote:
[...]
ME> I'm not sure how that addresses the issue though. What happens if you
ME> add an alias to the above that says:
ME> ayp: ayp,forwardingaddress@???
postmaster1: ayp1
ayp1: ayp1@localhost,goodboss@???
ME> Does mail to postmaster go to both ayp and
ME> forwardingaddress@???? This is what I'm trying to achieve.
ayp@valinor:/usr/local/etc/exim/virtual$ exim -bt postmaster1@???
ayp1@localhost
<-- ayp1@???
<-- postmaster1@???
router = localuser, transport = local_delivery
goodboss@???
<-- ayp1@???
<-- postmaster1@???
router = dnslookup, transport = remote_smtp
host mxs.mail.ru [194.67.23.20] MX=10
This require localhost to be in local_domains.
Also I can route ayp1@??? directly to virtual1 router (see
previous posting; skipped here to avoid excessive quoting).
postmaster1: ayp1
ayp1: ayp1+ayp.msk.ru@???,goodboss@???
ayp@valinor:/usr/local/etc/exim/virtual$ exim -bt postmaster1@???
ayp1+ayp.msk.ru@???
<-- ayp1@???
<-- postmaster1@???
router = virtual1, transport = local_virtual_delivery
goodboss@???
<-- ayp1@???
<-- postmaster1@???
router = dnslookup, transport = remote_smtp
host mxs.mail.ru [194.67.23.20] MX=10
ME> Perhaps the answer is not to have local users that are the same as email
ME> addresses.
I think that email addresses in virtual domains should be isolated from
system accounts. They are completely different entities.
--
Alexey Y. Promokhov, system administrator
Joint Stock Venture "GP Telecom", Moscow, Russia
