On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 09:11:07AM +0000, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> > Maybe SMTP isn't the right answer, but we need some form of injection
> > protocol with better error handling than a single status value.
>
> Batch SMTP might be a good start...
There is also non-TCP/IP SMTP (the -bs option). That allows you to use
the SMTP protocol (over stdin/stdout), but Exim still knows this is a
"local" message and treats it in the same way as a non-SMTP injection.
(And it allows multiple messages, of course.)
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
