punster@??? (James P. Roberts) writes:
> This is good to know! So your point about blocking AOL dialups is
> quite valid; that is, we cannot depend on AOL to always provide 100%
> proxy coverage. But those like myself still have to provide an
> alternative port for our own customers who are using AOL. Sigh.
> Nothing like a half-ahem job of doing something, eh? ;)
Yeah. At least, in exim 4, you can have accept_authenticated = * before the
DNSBL checks kick in ...
> I understood that part. I was under the impression that some people
> were considering looking at headers, in order to determine if a mail
> "originated" from an AOL dial-up host, even though it was relayed
That would be stupid.
srs
