Steve Haslam wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 09:50:14AM +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:
>
>>>I ought to write a patch for spec.txt or spec.texinfo too. Sorry. Phil, if
>>>you want people to write documentation for their patches, which format do
>>>you want it in?
>>
>>Plain text. Both spec.txt and spec.texinfo are generated from my master
>>source, which is marked up in a parochial markup language. However, if a
>>patch to spec.txt is a convenient way of sending me the information,
>>then use that.
>
>
> OK, I have updated http://www.arise.demon.co.uk/exim_hmac_path with a patch
http://www.arise.demon.co.uk/exim_hmac_patch
> to spec.txt describing ${hmac_...}. I will try and get round to adding
> documentation on the other patches I've done, as well as sorting them out
> into separate blocks for people to browse.
Mhhh, i personaly don't like the way you implemented it, because it uses
: as delimeter for the parameters, for multi-parameter-things exim uses
{} everywhere, so your patch should use it too (IMHO). But maybe i'm
just confused with the difference between an item and an operator.
I just looked over it, and it seems like it will not allow : in the secret.
ciao
