On 16 October 2002, Nigel Metheringham said:
> [loud cheer - I nearly pushed it all to the mailman list yesterday as I
> have to approve all posts from the mailman guys who are not on the exim
> list :-) ]
Yeah, sorry about that. I *think* mailman-developers also has a
hold-posts-from-non-members bit set, so either way it's a PITA for
someone. ;-(
> First the pedantic....
[...]
> [I would add the word "distinct" at this point]
Good point -- I'll send Barry the patch.
> # Single mailman (list) handling router. Handles both
> # the administration addresses (which have suffixes on)
> # and the (bare) list post address.
> mailman_router:
> driver = accept
> require_files = MAILMAN_HOME/lists/$local_part/config.pck
> local_part_suffix_optional
> local_part_suffix = -bounces : -bounces+* : \
> -confirm+* : -join : -leave : \
> -owner : -request : -admin
> transport = mailman_transport
From the comments (Marc's?) in the previous README.EXIM, I think the
rationale for having two routers (directors) was to accomodate lists
named eg. 'foo-owner'. On reflection, I realize this is only a problem
if you *also* have a list named 'foo' -- and that combination is just
doomed to fail with *any* MTA configuration. One router (director) it
is.
Greg
--
Greg Ward <gward@???> http://www.gerg.ca/
Question authority!
