Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> It would seem more sensible now to consider going to a configuration
> method that allows the exiscan items to be pushed into ACLs - although
> they obviously have to be ACLs that are run at end-data time.
I've been playing with that thought too when I recently messed with my
own ACL configuration.
There would be new ACL types like 'acl_smtp_av' or 'acl_smtp_spamd',
checked by exim right after acl_smtp_data. These would replace the
current "facilities" of exiscan. The new ACLs would have their own
specific conditions, like spam_score_below etc. etc.
Hmm. Tasty. Must resist urge to start right away.
I'll keep that in mind when going for the next major code
rewrite/cleanup. This will take a while, tho. :)
regards,
/tom
--
Tom Kistner <tom@???>
ICQ 1501527 dcanthrax@efnet
http://duncanthrax.net
