Re: [Exim] Small change to exiwhat

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
M++\Nigel Metheringham at <-
MMMMPhilip Hazel at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Dave C.
Date:  
To: Iain Price
CC: Nico Erfurth, exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] Small change to exiwhat
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Iain Price wrote:

> Nico Erfurth wrote:
> > Iain Price wrote:

[..]

> True, but i think *all* unix implements process numbers as an increasing
> wrapping number, 16 bit (signed?). Anyway, if signed, you would have to
> have some ten thousand processes start and die per second for this to be
> an issue :D

FYI, OpenBSD uses *random* process numbers ;)




This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Exim] Fw: using the result of a perl script as address list[Exim] amavis and exim3, exit code 13 ....FAIL->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)