Re: [Exim] Small change to exiwhat

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
M++\Matthew Byng-Maddick at <-
MMMMPhilip Hazel at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Iain Price
CC: Nico Erfurth, exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] Small change to exiwhat
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Iain Price wrote:

> True, but i think *all* unix implements process numbers as an increasing
> wrapping number, 16 bit (signed?).

AIX (IIRC) does not use incrementing pids (but somehow manages not to
re-use one for some time). 

--
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.




This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Exim] return-path user -- local vs. smtpRe: [Exim] Small change to exiwhat->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)