Re: [Exim] Small change to exiwhat

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Iain Price wrote:

> Nico Erfurth wrote:
> > Iain Price wrote:

[..]

> True, but i think *all* unix implements process numbers as an increasing
> wrapping number, 16 bit (signed?). Anyway, if signed, you would have to
> have some ten thousand processes start and die per second for this to be
> an issue :D

FYI, OpenBSD uses *random* process numbers ;)