--
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 09:02:31AM +0100, Matt Bernstein wrote:
| On May 26 dman wrote:
|
| >On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 03:43:29PM +0100, Matt Bernstein wrote:
| >| Because it's a Friday afternoon it took me a little while to spot that the
| >| mail was being delivered with local-esmtp seemingly ignoring my -oMr.
| >|
| >| I'm not asking for a change to the Exim code; however, I'd request a note
| >| put in the spec in the relevant place. (5.3?)
| >
| >In the spec the -oMr option is discussed. It says to see the
| >discussion of -oMa. The discussion of -oMa has this :
| >
| > In other circumstances, [-oM options] are ignored unless the
| > caller is trusted.
| >
| >Is the user invoking exim with -oMr "trusted"?
|
| Yes. But I think something different is happening because of the "-bs".
That shouldn't matter. I've used -bS and -oMr at the same time and
didn't have any trouble.
-D
--
If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not
in us.
I John 1:8
GnuPG key :
http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/public_key.gpg
--
[ Content of type application/pgp-signature deleted ]
--
