Re: [Exim] why was this rbl checked?

Page principale
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: dman
Date:  
À: exim-users
Sujet: Re: [Exim] why was this rbl checked?
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 03:46:05PM -0400, Dave C. wrote:
| On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, dman wrote:

|
| >
| > I have the following relevant portions of my exim4 config :
| >
| >
| > hostlist not_rbl_hosts = <, !192.168.0.0/23 , !127.0.0.1/32 , !::1

|
| Why /23 ? Is this a typo, or are you really excluding specifically
| 192.168.0.0 through 192.168.1.255?


When I originally wrote that (in a v3 conf file) I was intending to
have the host be a smarthost for my dad an brother. I was also
intending to put the win* machines on 192.168.1.0/24 and the debian
machines on 192.168.0.0/24. As you can see, those two subnets can be
"combined" to 192.168.0.0/23. Since 192.168.0.0/16 is all private,
it's really just a subset of the private class C.

-D

--

The way of a fool seems right to him,
but a wise man listens to advice.
        Proverbs 12:15