On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, dman wrote:
>
> I have the following relevant portions of my exim4 config :
>
>
> hostlist not_rbl_hosts = <, !192.168.0.0/23 , !127.0.0.1/32 , !::1
Why /23 ? Is this a typo, or are you really excluding specifically
192.168.0.0 through 192.168.1.255?
>
> warn hosts = +not_rbl_hosts : !129.21.30.24
> dnslists = \
> dsn.rfc-ignorant.org/$sender_address_domain : \
> postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org/$sender_address_domain : \
> abuse.rfc-ignorant.org/$sender_address_domain
> message = X-RBL-Warning: $sender_address_domain , $dnslist_domain , $dnslist_value , $dnslist_text
> log_message = RBL : $sender_address_domain , $dnslist_domain , $dnslist_value , $dnslist_text
>
>
> I got this in my rejectlog :
>
> 2002-04-11 19:07:44 H=(martha.itusa.org) [192.168.0.4] Warning: RBL : 192.168.0.4 , abuse.rfc-ignorant.org , 127.0.0.4 , Not supporting abuse@domain
>
> (I just realized I had $sender_host_address instead of
> $sender_address_domain in the log message, which is why it doesn't
> match the newly fixed config)
>
> My understanding is that that message shouldn't have been checked at
> all because it came from 192.168.0.4 (the internal side of that host).
> As it was, the domain in the Reply-To: is what failed the test.
>
> Why was this message checked?
>
> TIA,
> -D
>
> --
>
> Commit to the Lord whatever you do,
> and your plans will succeed.
> Proverbs 16:3
>
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
>
>
--
