Re: [Exim] auditing bandwidth

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Colin
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] auditing bandwidth
There are several cases where the sending server is not the receiving
server, especially in larger ISP's.
You may want to reconsider this.
(for example, Shaw's sending server is shawmail.cg.shawcable.net. It's
receiving server is idcmail.shaw.ca.)
Sounds like a good recipe for lots of bounced emails that you actually
wanted.


Lauri Tischler wrote:

> There was some discussion about that on another forum.
> Any pros or cons ??
>
> Idea was that if sending server does not have valid MX record
> it is so badly administered that it is propably sending spam
> as well (and their users have lice and bad breath) :)
>
> Is there way to do that on Exim ?
> By reading the docs, mx_domain affects sending only.
>
> Cheers
> --
> lauri.tischler@???
>
>
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
>
>