On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, I. Forbes wrote:
> Can it be that messages which are addresses to both local
> addresses and head office addresses are not updating the timeout
> data. Most of the traffic seems to fall into this catagory.
Shouldn't be. Addresses are treated entirely independently.
> I had a look at the retry database with exim_dumpdb at the time I
> extracted the above logs. I could not see anything obviously wrong
> but I may not have known what I was looking for.
I suspect the only way we'll understand this is when it happens again,
if you can run a delivery with -Mc and debugging turned on, to see what
Exim thinkgs it is doing. (Note: -Mc and not -M, so as not to override
the retry data.)
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
