Re: [Exim] removing 'frozen' messages

Etusivu
Poista viesti
Vastaa
Lähettäjä: Ken Jackson
Päiväys:  
Vastaanottaja: Christopher Curtis
Kopio: exim-users, K.Jackson
Aihe: Re: [Exim] removing 'frozen' messages
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Ken Jackson wrote:

> > > > > # If you can't return an error message after 2 days, delete it.
> > > > > ignore_errmsg_errors_after = 48h
> >
> > > > The whole point of my original question was that I have these
> > > > settings in my configure file, but they don't appear to be working?
> >
> > > In your original post, you only the mentioned timeout_frozen_after limit.
> >
> > Actually, in my original post, I clearly state:
> >
> > } In my configure file, I have the following settings of:
> > } ignore_errmsg_errors_after = 4d
> > } timeout_frozen_after = 7d
> > } *       *      F,2h,15m; G,16h,1h,1.5; F,4d,8h


> Ahh, yes. My bad - didn't see that.


> > Also, please forgive my inexperience, as I am very new to Email


> I am by far no expert - I've been admin'ing exim for ~1 month now, and
> only because it's the default MTA for Debian. =)


> > administration, but from the documentation in the Exim manual (page
> > 15), I understand the <> in the return path means "Delivery failure
> > reports (bounce messages) are sent out with empty envelope sender
> [...]
> > the empty <> is nothing to do with 'spam' and is actually a desired
> > thing to have? Or am I reading it incorrectly?


> From what I've seen, <teenage-sluts99999@???> sends a bunch of
> email to users that do not exist on our server. This causes Exim to
> generate an error message saying that the message cannot be delivered.
> However, there is no teenage-sluts99999 at hotmail.com, so the message
> gets frozen and will never be delivered. This is what I assumed your
> problem to be. These settings seem to be working for me, so I'm sorry
> that I can't help afterall :(
> Chris


I've already alleviated that particular problem by using the
'recieve_verify = true' and 'sender_verify = true' settings,
so that we no longer even get those messages on our queue at all.

Cheers


Regards,

    Ken Jackson,
----------------------------------------------------------------