Re: [Exim] autoreply with changed sender

All 'bounce' type messages hould _always_ be send with the NULL (<>)
sender. What is the 'one case' where you beleive you cant use it?

If it is a remote server which refuses to acept "MAIL FROM:<>", that
*THAT* server is broken and in violation of RFC, and it would be
inappropriate to make a specical exception for it.

On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:

> I'd like to use "mail" command in Exim filter and change the default
> sender for this bouce message. I can't use empty '<>' sender in one case.
> I think "pipe" command wouldn't be the best method because bounced message
> doesn't contain any element of original mail. What can I do?
>
>

--