On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 07:42:40PM +0100,
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <A.C.Aitchison@???> is thought to have said:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Matt Bernstein wrote:
>
> > As we (those in .ac.uk) are being pushed into using rbl-plus, I'd like to
> > know which of the RBL, DUL & RSS list my RBL+ mails. Unfortunately, at
> > present Exim will not record the returned IP address in the X-RBL-Warning:
> > header, so everything is listed as "(rbl-plus...)".
>
> See the bits in green* in chapter 46.1
> http://www.exim.org/exim-html-3.20/doc/html/spec_46.html#SEC810
> for those of you in black and white, the green bits are new since the
> 3.10 documentation...
>
> However maps don't appear to document the meanings of the returned IP
> addresses, so I have a way of distinguishing the addresses returned,
> but until I know what they mean I'm not sure what I want to do with
> them :-).
This came across the spamtools mailing list the other day:
rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org
Return codes are:
127.1.0.1 RBL
127.1.0.2 DUL
127.1.0.3 DUL and RBL
127.1.0.4 RSS
127.1.0.5 RSS and RBL
127.1.0.6 RSS and DUL
127.1.0.7 RSS and DUL and RBL
Tabor
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Tabor J. Wells twells@???
Fsck It! Just another victim of the ambient morality
