Re: [Exim] Exim-3.31 refuses to start. [soleil]

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Dave C.
Date:  
To: Odhiambo Washington
CC: Exim Users
Old-Topics: Re: [Exim] Exim-3.31 refuses to start.
Subject: Re: [Exim] Exim-3.31 refuses to start. [soleil]

You could add an additional exception - record the message-ID of each
message you send, and look for a "References" (Im not sure if thats the
exact name of it, also I think there might be two different headers
used) header which includes a message ID of any message you originally
sent.. (You could also save Subject line content, and look for a subject
coming back which contains a subject from a message you wrote)

I've added your magic word to the subject so you get this mail, but (as
efective as it might be), requiring anyone who wants to mail you to do
that is still rude, even if you tell them ahead of time.

Personally, I get very little spam in my mailbox anymore, even though my
email address has been in a WHOIS listing for over five years. Or
rather, lots of spam TRIES to get to me, most fails.

I have sender-verification enabled, with SMTP callbacks turned on.

I also have a personal filter setup that looks for my personal
address(es) in To: or Cc: lines. (I have quite a few of them, since I
fill a variety of roles). It has exceptions for senders in certain
domains, and for certain mailing lists, and a few other special cases.
Anything else gets thrown in a junk folder. I would say over 95% of all
spam that tries to get to me doesnt. Of the stuff that makes it through
the SMTP callback, at least 90% of it ends up in the junk folder. I've
nver had any important, legitimate mail end up in the junk folder.


On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Odhiambo Washington wrote:

> * Phil Pennock <Phil.Pennock@???> [20010709 07:40]: writing on the subject 'Re: [Exim] Exim-3.31 refuses to start.'
> Phil> On 2001-07-08 at 16:39 +0300, Odhiambo Washington gifted us with:
> Phil> > This might interest some of us.
> Phil>
> Phil> Whoever it interests, you're not doing yourself any favours by posting
> Phil> to a mailing list asking for help when you don't accept email unless
> Phil> people go out of their way to meet your whims.
>
> This is rather OT:
>
> I am sorry about this. However, if someone has got a better and painless (not creating enemies out of
> potential friends) way of dealing with unsolicited Commercial E-mails, I am very much willing to
> implement that, so that I don't get blacklisted by the good crowd.
> I'm sure everyone on a couple of mailing lists receive SPAM at some point or another. I don't subcribe
> to any of those silly Internet biz hoaxes but i still end up getting my SPAM folder full every week. Not
> that I am trying to justify the annoyance I've caused anyone, including Phil Pennock (_i'm deeply
> sorry_) but just soliciting better ideas that are better than what I do now.
>
> For the time being I'll always put a note in all my postings kindly requesting those who elect to reply
> to my personal address to simply add the word 'soleil' to the subject line. Sounds like what Hennock
> calls 'people go out of their way to meet your whims', that I sincerely regret, since I could have taken
> this initiative initially and I'm sure it couldn't have cost so much agony than it already done.
>
>
> -Wash
>
> --
> Odhiambo Washington
> Wananchi Online Ltd.,
> wash@??? 1st Flr Loita Hse.
> Tel: 254 2 313985 Loita Street.,
> Fax: 254 2 313922 PO Box 10286,00100-NAIROBI,KE.
>
> Now, in reality, the world have paid too great a compliment to critics, and
> have imagined them to be men of much greater profundity then they really are.
> -Henry Fielding
> (contributed by Chris Johnston)
>


--