Re: [Exim] relay problem

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Tamas TEVESZ
Date:  
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] relay problem
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:

> The other way around is much more efficient - the new box should be a
> primary MX for the domain, and aliases for these 5 addresses should be
> mapped pointing to the old box.


the original mail is as: "
i was asked to relay all the incoming messages
on my server to a new domain MX, but 5 mailboxes should stay on
my server.
"

so, whilst your solution really is more efficient, it just does not
fulfill the problem's marginal conditions, thus wrong :)

--
[-]
"`rendes' `thread library' `unix' - ezeknek nincs kozos gyokuk" -- redax