Author: Tamas TEVESZ Date: To: Suresh Ramasubramanian CC: exim-users Subject: Re: [Exim] relay problem
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> The other way around is much more efficient - the new box should be a
> primary MX for the domain, and aliases for these 5 addresses should be
> mapped pointing to the old box.
the original mail is as: "
i was asked to relay all the incoming messages
on my server to a new domain MX, but 5 mailboxes should stay on
my server.
"
so, whilst your solution really is more efficient, it just does not
fulfill the problem's marginal conditions, thus wrong :)