Re: [Exim] port number logging in received lines

Página superior
Este mensaje es parte del siguiente hilo:
MEl árbol completo de hilos, ordenados por fecha
M-\Jeffrey Goldberg, mensaje del <-
M\MPhilip Hazel, mensaje del ->
Eliminar este mensaje
Responder a este mensaje
Autor: Philip Blundell
Fecha:  
A: Philip Hazel
Cc: exim-users
Asunto: Re: [Exim] port number logging in received lines
>> IPv6 address literals are just a disaster anyway.
>
>Very true. What made them chose colon?

Dunno. Precedent set by Ethernet addresses, maybe.

>I *thought* I was following an established standard, but obviously I was
>deluded. How about 1.2.3.4-25 and 3ffe::1:2:3-25 as an alternative?

Sure, that looks OK to me.

p.




Este mensaje se envió a las siguientes listas de correo:
Exim-users
Información de la lista de correo | Mensajes cercanos		<-[Exim] local delivery via smtpRe: [Exim] port number logging in received lines->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrado por cumin AdminsLurker (versión 2.3)