Re: [Exim] port number logging in received lines

On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Philip Hazel wrote:

> I *thought* I was following an established standard, but obviously I was
> deluded. How about 1.2.3.4-25 and 3ffe::1:2:3-25 as an alternative?

Or use "p" instead of "-" perhaps.

-j

--
Jeffrey Goldberg
I have recently moved, see http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/contact.html
Relativism is the triumph of authority over truth, convention over justice