Re: [Exim] Planning for Exim 4

トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: Philip Hazel
日付:  
To: Richard Welty
CC: exim-users
題目: Re: [Exim] Planning for Exim 4
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Richard Welty wrote:

> i agree that routers & directors should be combined, but as a networking
> person, it'd be preferable to me if the new entity were not called a router.


I did say "unless someone can find a better name". However, there have
been no suggestions, and I don't think there is one. Also, people talk
about "mail routing" regularly. This goes back to the days of RFC 821,
and I think that's before Cisco or Nortel even existed.

Anyway, routing a message is very similar in concept to routing a
packet: both processes decide where the object is to be sent.

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.