Re: [Exim] Failing behviour based on SMTP codes.

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Exim Users Mailing List
Date:  
To: Exim Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Exim] Failing behviour based on SMTP codes.
[ On Wednesday, October 18, 2000 at 10:47:59 (+0100), Philip Hazel wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: [Exim] Failing behviour based on SMTP codes.
>
> For a busy host, it pays to have a backup MX standing right next to it,
> for the following reasons:


Those are good reasons for having parallel MXers. Only when the
"backup" server cannot handle 1/2 the load normally should it be given a
lower-priority MX.

Of course in this case all MXers are still under direct and hopefully
immediate control of the same administrators so can enforce the same
access controls and thus lots of the reasons for avoiding MXers do not
apply in this case.

-- 
                            Greg A. Woods


+1 416 218-0098      VE3TCP      <gwoods@???>      <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <woods@???>; Secrets of the Weird <woods@???>