Re: [Exim] (no subject)

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: E.A.Joseph
Date:  
To: Jeffrey Goldberg
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] (no subject)
Thanks for all the suggestion- adding header lines to the messages would be
more appropriate to what I'm trying to achieve. We are testing AmaVis - and
my colleague does not which to scan all outbound messages. Therefore a
filter variable equated with received_protocol (set by AmaVis) would enable
us to selectively scan messages.

I have not tried the solution as yet!


Cheer

Earl



----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeffrey Goldberg" <jeffrey+lists@???>
To: "E.A.Joseph" <e.a.joseph@???>
Cc: <exim-users@???>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Exim] (no subject)


> On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, E.A.Joseph wrote:
>
> > Are there any exim variables (or user defined variables) which can be

set in
> > a filer file- and then be expanded/tested in a conditional statement of

a
> > router.
>
> I am delighted that someone wants to actually use this feature[1],
>
> In section 9.5 of the spec (Expansion variables), see
>
> $sn0 - $sn9: These variables are copies of the values of the $n0 - $n9
> accumulators that were current at the end of the system filter file.

This
> allows a system filter file to set values that can be tested in users'
> filter files. For example, a system filter could set a value indicating

how
> likely it is that a message is junk mail.
>
>
> -j
>
> Note: [1]
> I was the one who made a wishlist request for that feature, but never
> used it. So I would feel slightly less guilty if someone actually found
> the feature useful.
>
>
> --
> Jeffrey Goldberg
> I have recently moved, see http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/contact.html
> Relativism is the triumph of authority over truth, convention over justice
>