Re: [Exim] Should vacation messages go to reply_address or r…

Page principale
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: Philip Hazel
Date:  
À: robert rotman
CC: Greg A. Woods, exim-users
Sujet: Re: [Exim] Should vacation messages go to reply_address or return_path?
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, robert rotman wrote:

> how can you insert a header with exim?
>
> headers_add = "Precedence: bulk" - in the vacation transport or director
> or both does nothing.
> even tested it with -d9.


If the transport is an autoreply transport, the generic headers_add
won't do what you want, because it adds to the *original* message, not
the newly-created one. The autoreply transport has a "headers" option to
specify headers for the new message.

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.