Re: [Exim] Should vacation messages go to reply_address or return

Auteur: Philip Hazel
Date:
À: Vadim Vygonets
CC: exim-users
Sujet: Re: [Exim] Should vacation messages go to reply_address or return_path?

On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Vadim Vygonets wrote:

> In short, Reply-To: is for personal replies.

This issue has been thrashed to death, probably several times, on the
DRUMS mailing list. It is a rathole for which no consensus has been
reached. Please don't fill up the Exim list with yet another re-run of
this debate.

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.

Ce message fait partie du fil suivant :
	Arborescence complète du fil triée par date
	Vadim Vygonets à
	Philip Hazel à

Re: [Exim] Should vacation messages go to reply_address or r…