> For those that didn't see it, John's suggestion is for an option to continue > to deliver unless a user is *over* quota (so it would be unlike a system
> quota), with facilities for allowing certain messages to bypass the quota
> checking.
>
> My personal feeling is that this is a bit over elaborate, and I don't
> like the idea of Exim quotas working differently to system quotas. What
> are the views of others on this list?
I agree, exim quotas should work like system quotas. If you want fancy
quota systems with exceptions and exceptions for exceptions, then use a
fancy transport, similar to how people use procmail instead of exim for
actual delivery.
