Re: [Exim] Use of $reply_to address in vacation mechanism

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: John Horne
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] Use of $reply_to address in vacation mechanism
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, John Horne wrote:

> > Consider:
> >
> > From: tom@domain1, dick@domain2, harry@domain3
> > Sender: tom@domain1
> > Reply-To: dick@domain2
> > Subject: Invite
> >
> > Please come to our joint party. RSVP to Dick.
> >
> Hmm, good example :-) However, I suspect that nowadays people (e.g. 'tom')
> would simply send the message and mention Dick and Harry in the text:


Oh, sure. What the author or RFC822 envisaged as a common way of working
hasn't in practice happened. Not only in this case! RFC822 is full of
'features' that are almost never used for real. Whoever actually wants
to send out addresses like this example in the RFC?

        Wilt . (the  Stilt) Chamberlain@???                   


             The "(the  Stilt)" is a comment, which is NOT included in
        the  destination  mailbox  address  handed  to the originating
        system's mailer.  The local-part of the address is the  string
        "Wilt.Chamberlain", with NO space between the first and second
        words.                                                        



-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.