Quoth Michael Stevens on Wed, Jul 26, 2000: > I try to keep an eye on message headers occasionally, for various
> reasons. I find that a lot of the time, 'external' mail hosts for big companies
> are running something recent, but exim 1.xx releases are _very_ common
> for internal systems.
This has its reasons. While external hosts are important to keep
up to date because of bugs and potential security features, as
well as new possibilities every version introduces, upgrading
internal hosts is often cumbersome and not really critical
(unless a bug is found which really interferes with sending
mail).
> Doesn't someone here collect stats on this? I'm sure I've seen them come
> through here before.
There were some stats about it, but without versions:
From: Nigel Metheringham <Nigel.Metheringham@???>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 10:37:50 +0000
Message-Id: <E0zZBwE-0002fa-00@???>
Subject: [EXIM] Mail systems stats etc
Vadik.
--
Do not meddle in the affairs of troff, for it is subtle and quick
to anger.
