On 24 Mar 2000 nbecker@??? wrote:
> /usr/sbin/exim -d 200 test
> Exim version 3.03 debug level 200 uid=3591 gid=3591
> Berkeley DB: Sleepycat Software: DB 2.4.14: (6/2/98)
> rpppc2.hns.com in local_domains? no (end of list)
> Actual local interface address is 127.0.0.1
> Actual local interface address is 139.85.108.141
> sender address = nbecker@???
> set_process_info: 18842 3.03 accepting a local non-SMTP message from <nbecker@???>
> [...]
>
> Why does it say rpppc2.hns.com is not in local_domains?
>
> /usr/sbin/exim -bP local_domains
> local_domains = rpppc2.hns.com:hns.com:localhost:localhost.hns.com:[139.85.108.141]
That's a very good question! I can't see any obvious errors there.
And this can't be happening regularly as otherwise lots of people would
be complaining, and nobody has, and 3.03 was a pretty stable release
that was current for quite some time.
Code is going to have to be hacked to track this one down.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
