Hi Peter,
receiver_verify works great for me.
Thank you again and have good new millenium.
###
Peter Radcliffe wrote:
>
> Toshio Kumagai <Toshio_Kumagai@???> probably said:
> > Yes, but I think it should be rejected intentionaly such
> > like percent-hack rejection.
>
> It's a possibly valid local part.
>
> > That's the problem.
> > The spammer believes that I maight receive his spam, then I bounce
> > it back to his site...
> > I don't want to spam anybody even if he was a spammer ;-)
>
> Take a look at the verification options, try turning on;
>
> receiver_verify
>
> Type: boolean
> Default: false
>
> When this option is set, the addresses of recipients received from a
> remote host are verified as they are received, provided the sending host
> matches receiver_verify_hosts, the incoming address matches
> receiver_verify_addresses, and the sender address matches
> receiver_verify_senders, if either of the last two are set.
>
> If an address is invalid, an incoming SMTP call gets an error response to
> the RCPT command. If an address cannot immediately be verified, a
> temporary error code is given. The receiver_try_verify option is less
> severe: it operates in the same way, except that an address is accepted if
> it cannot immediately be verified. Verification failures are logged.
>
> P.
>
> --
> pir pir@??? pir@???
>
> --
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
--
Toshio Kumagai (Toshio_Kumagai@???), Japan
