Re: [Exim] Suggestions for a better error message?

> > I had a few confused customers by now that were puzzled by the
> > following error message:
> >
> > no valid sender in message headers: return path is <>
> >
> > This means: There was no valid sender in message headers,
> > but the problem is NOT the return path!
>
> Yes. Others have been confused by it. What I wanted to do was to record
> the return path in case it could help in debugging.

I like this suggestion most, because it makes really clear that
the return path is not guilty.

> envelope return path is <> but there is no valid sender in the message's headers

Michael